Perhaps counterintuitively, Euroscepticism as a wholesale rejection of the European Union or a rejection of aspects of European integration is common among the publics in European border regions. However, different border regions also show large differences in their electoral support for Eurosceptic parties. Is this because models of the geographical spread of Eurosceptic attitudes to date have not yet been fully specified, or are there local reasons for Euroscepticism that are not easily modelled using European election or opinion poll data? In investigating these questions, this paper speaks to the 'Agnew-King debate', in which the geographer Agnew argued that social and political processes grow out of local circumstances, whereas the political scientist King suggested treating the geographical distribution of political phenomena as 'epiphenomenal', or indicative of so-far unmodelled variation.
To flesh out the phenomenon 'Euroscepticism', this paper presents qualitative data in the shape of Eurosceptic narratives. These were drawn from three sources (regional media, interviews with candidates in the 2024 European elections and focus groups with border region residents) in four European border regions: the Franco-German, Danish-Swedish, Polish-German-Czech and Slovak-Hungarian border regions. The analysis shows that some narratives, such as the charge that the EU is overly bureaucratic, are uniform across space. However, other such narratives take on a distinctly local form, reflecting not only the special situation of border regions in Europe but also the special situation of particular border regions in Europe. In doing so, the paper suggests that Agnew's attention to local context has enduring value.